Conditions are less than ideal, let us say, for President George W. Bush’s last state of the union speech, to be delivered today. This is an administration that had precious little to boast about even before the economy began to nose-dive – a calamity that may not yet be plain in the figures but was certified by the Federal Reserve’s dramatic interest rate cut last week. One wonders, how much worse can things get for this White House?
For months, the need to address economic anxiety has been a well-established theme in the campaigns of all the presidential candidates but until recently it was possible for Republicans to talk as though the ongoing expansion were a flawed success. When Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, took the economy’s temperature a week ago and recoiled like the figure in Edvard Munch’s “The Scream”, that calm posture was no longer available. Alarm on Wall Street is business as usual; alarm verging on panic at the Federal Reserve is more difficult to shrug off.
The president’s haste to design a fiscal-stimulus plan in co-operation with Congressional Democrats was almost as disconcerting. The deal, still tentative until the Senate has had its say, underscores the pessimism. In its own right (even assuming that it moves briskly and intact back to the president for his signature) the proposal is a puny initiative. Its mere existence, though, is a weighty political fact.
You can read the rest of this FT column here.
This is an administration that had precious little to boast about even before the economy began to nose-dive – a calamity that may not yet be plain in the figures
Not plain in the figures means "ignore all the empirical data. " Just trust us that the economy sucks.
Bush has presided over 52 months of consecutive job growth. Little to boast about? I understand that you hate Bush and I understand that you're as partisan as it comes, but to try to make 2+2=6 is below a crook like you.
Posted by al Frick | January 29, 2008 6:18 PM